Women

Critical Social Policy Analysis and its Potential for Social Justice

Copyright A. Lathouras, C. O’Connor and G. Frawley. Peer reviewed Journal Article first published in New Community, Vol.21 (3)(83), pp. 26-31. 2023.

Abstract: If critical community development is committed to the pursuit of social justice and human rights, then a structural analysis of the root causes of oppression should be foregrounded. This then informs citizen advocacy to work towards social change. Moreover, practice in communities is shaped by social policy as it impacts the welfare of a nation’s citizens. The laws of the land comprise mechanisms for distributing society’s resources, and social policy is underpinned by values, driven by political objectives, and maintained by discursive practices. Drawing on Carol Bacchi’s (2009) critical approach to social policy analysis, this article presents two case study stories where social work students applied a structural analysis to examine the effects of social policy on First Nations communities. This analysis complements a critical approach to community development practice and guides progressive action. 

Introduction

At the University of the Sunshine Coast (UniSC), all social work students complete the courses: Community Development and Social Action and Critical Social Policy Analysis. The first author teaches both, and where theory intersects, critical approaches to both practices are foregrounded. The community development course draws from ideas in the critical tradition as articulated by Margaret Ledwith (2011). This is where practice seeks to build social solidarity and provide a lens through which existing societal structures are examined, enabling more egalitarian, supportive, and sustainable alternatives. Drawing from the Freirean tradition of community education (Freire, 1970 & Freire, 1974), and as radical educators, practitioners facilitate processes that empower people to analyse their lived experiences and collectively act in the hope of transforming those experiences.

For the context of social policy analysis, we gain inspiration from Saul Alinsky’s seminal text Rules for Radicals (1971). Alinsky called for a “reformation”, the process where masses of people reach a point of disillusionment with past ways and values and then, together, organise, build power, and change the system from within (Alinsky 1971:114). Discussing the importance of social democratic reform through citizenship, Alinsky (1971:115) was “desperately concerned” that masses of people, through lack of interest or opportunity, are resigned to live lives determined by others. He argued that, 

The spirit of democracy is the idea of importance and worth in the individual, and faith in the kind of world where the individual can achieve as much of his (sic) potential as possible…. Separation of the people from the routine daily functions of citizenship is heartbreak in a democracy (Alinsky 1971:115).  

Active citizenship can be traced back to the ancient Greek concept of agora, a site of political assembly, an interface between the public and private spheres of social life. In contemporary times, community development can be seen as an expression of “the political and politicized assembly of an active citizenry in civil society”, or a form of politics whereby citizens participate in civil society through communicative action to directly socialise policy issues (Geoghegan & Powell 2009:431).

Critical Social Policy Analysis

In the coursework at UniSC, we draw on Carol Bacchi’s (2009) theory to directly socialise policy issues. In her “What’s the problem represented to be?” approach to critical social policy analysis, Bacchi’s central thesis is that policies give shape to “problems” in society. Government cannot get to work without first problematising its territory, assuming the existence of problems that need to be ‘fixed’. Problematising is how something is represented as ‘a problem’, and social policy reflects what government thinks needs to change. Drawing on post-structural theories, where language or discourses are full of ideology and beliefs, these speak to and uphold one’s ‘truth’. Bacchi (2009) posits these are contested with taken-for-granted assumptions or presuppositions and can be interrogated with other possible standpoints. 

Bacchi’s six-question framework helps us with the interrogation:

  • Q1. What’s ‘the problem’ represented to be, or what’s the ‘problem representation’? Social policy students are encouraged to think from the policy writer’s perspective about the purpose of a policy, its vision, mission, and objectives.
  • Q2. What presuppositions or assumptions underlie this representation of the problem? Students are encouraged to put themselves in the shoes of the government and interrogate this question bothappreciatively and critically. For example, most social policies have strong social democratic and neoliberal underpinning ideology and language.
  • Q3. How has this representation of the problem come about?
  • Here students are encouraged to research the history of a chosen policy area, not from a ‘version control’ perspective, but from the perspective of how society’s attitudes and values have changed over time. For example, in a few short decades, we have gone from separating from society and institutionalising people with chronic disability; to deinstitutionalisation processes in the 1980s with block funding to NGOs; to the current National Disability Insurance Scheme where many people are in control of their own funding packages.
  • Q4. What is left unproblematic in this problem representation? This is where students are encouraged to draw from contemporary grey literature, including peak body reports and submissions to make arguments about what is silenced by the problem representation, or the way government has framed the issue.
  • Q5. What effects are produced by this representation of the problem?
  • Drawing on 500 hours of field education experience, students use their practice wisdom to name the effect on the people or end-users of the policy, both service users and fellow practitioners.
  • Q6. How could the problem representation be questioned, disrupted, and replaced? Here the tutors use a range of creative teaching techniques to help students think outside the box, and about how we can transcend the most deleterious effects of a policy on end-users or practitioners.  

Employing “authentic” assessment processes, which reaffirm the role of higher education in contributing to social justice (McArthur, 2023), students do a simulated policy advocacy presentation and write a simulated policy reform submission to government about the specific policy they’ve researched. The course this year has provided a sense of purpose and social work activism to final year social work students, Cheryl and Grace, co-authors of this paper. Below, each tells their story of applying Bacchi’s framework to social policy impacting on First Nations peoples. 

Cheryl’s Story – Close the Gap

With a legal background and a passion for community development work, recently I investigated an environmental issue impacting Indigenous inequality in Australia. I focused on the Close the Gap (CTG) Implementation Plan 2023, specifically Outcome 1, “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People enjoy long and healthy lives” and 9b, “Safe and reliable water for remote and regional First Nations Communities”. Under the recently elected Labor government, the 2023 version of the Close the Gap social policy seems collaborative with First Nations people, which is a significant improvement over past efforts by various governments. Since writing the 2005 Social Justice Report, Professor Tom Calma AO, argues progress has been made toward achieving health and life expectancy equality for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island peoples (Australian Indigenous Health Info Net, nd). However, the 2020 Close the Gap report highlighted that:

  • The Indigenous child mortality rate was 141 per 100,000 which is twice that of non-Indigenous children (Australian Government, 2020b).
  • Life expectancy at birth was 71.6 years for Indigenous males and 75.6 years for Indigenous females. In comparison, the non-Indigenous life expectancy at birth was 80.2 years for males and 83.4 years for females (Australian Government, 2020c).
  • During 2015 and 2017 the lowest life expectancy occurred in the Northern Territory (66.6 years for males and 83.4 years for females) (Australian Government, 2020c).

Concerning Outcome 1 of the policy, one of the current commitments is the funding of 30 four-chair haemodialysis units and two dialysis treatment buses throughout Australia. Because of a 2022 report by Water Services Association of Australia (WSAA) which identified 500 Indigenous communities lacking drinkable water due to elevated levels of uranium, arsenic, fluoride, and nitrate above Australian drinking water guidelines, CTG’s Outcome 9b allocates $150 million to the National Water Grid Fund for targeting clean drinking water access in Australian rural and remote communities. The report also found that regular water quality testing in these communities does not occur (WSAA, 2022). 

Initially conducting research for an environmental issue concerning Indigenous Australians, I was able to tie the two outcomes together (1 and 9b), which in the reading of CTG policy, did not appear to be connected.  Outcome 1 was only addressing symptoms by providing more dialysis units, not mentioning, or looking at the probable causes of increasing numbers of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

My preliminary research found evidence highlighting the lack of safe, clean water in the remote Aboriginal community of Laramba, Northern Territory and how despite community efforts to eliminate what they suspected was contaminated water via a court case, there were no laws requiring landlords to provide safe water (ABC News 2022a). Subsequently, the community lost the case. Ultimately, it took 15 years from when concerns were first raised by the Laramba community regarding their water supply before the Northern Territory government constructed and opened a water filtration plant for the community in April 2023 (Northern Territory Government and Information Services, 2023).

The present Australian Drinking Water Guideline level for uranium is 0.02mg/l and current testing reveals that the uranium level in the Laramba water supply has now dropped from between 0.029mg/l – 0.055mg/l to 0.01mg/l (Northern Territory Government and Information Services, 2023) because of the new filtration system.

In the remote Aboriginal community of Kiwirrkurra, Western Australia, the dialysis clinic had to be closed for two years due to contaminated water, and community members needing lifesaving haemodialysis had to travel 800 kilometres for treatment (Purple House, nd; ABC News, 2022b). The Kiwirrkurra article led me to Purple House, a non-profit Indigenous-run health organisation based in Alice Springs that provides haemodialysis treatments in clinics and services remote areas by bus. I spoke with Mr Michael Smith, bio-medical engineer at Purple House, who had invented and won an award for developing a reverse osmosis filtration system that had enabled the Kiwirrkurra clinic to re-open. Even though the clinic had re-opened, the community still did not have safe drinking water and it was reported that 700 bottles of water were being shipped in each week, creating a mountain of rubbish (ABC News, 2022b).

I had several conversations with Mr Smith concerning water quality in remote areas, the high volume of clean water required for haemodialysis treatments and the links between rancid tasting water, the substitution of drinking water for sugary drinks, diabetes, and subsequently CKD. Based on information provided by Mr Smith it is estimated that one patient requiring haemodialysis (3 treatments lasting between 3 to 5 hours per week), requires a total of 70,200 litres of clean, safe water per year. We also discussed the cost of commissioning and installing 20 reverse osmosis filtration systems in the remote communities that Purple House services, so that haemodialysis treatments could occur effectively within communities without community members needing to relocate or travel long distances.

Further research into chronic kidney disease (CKD), revealed that concerns have been growing among healthcare providers, affected community members and leaders regarding the increasing cases of diabetes and CKD in remote Aboriginal communities for quite some time (Rajapakse et. al., 2019; Pan, Owen & Oddy, 2021; Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2019). It was revealed that CKD has a probable cause associated with unpalatable or contaminated groundwater (Rajapakse et.al., 2019). Sugar-sweetened beverages, when substituted for water in communities where the water is rancid and undrinkable, have proven to create obesity which then leads to diabetes, renal failure, and other health issues (Gajjala, 2015; Hormones Australia Endocrine Society of Australia, 2018; Pan, Owen & Oddy, 2021).

Moreover, diabetic nephropathy is the most common type of kidney disease found in pregnant women (Fischer, 2007). A study in 2015 revealed that pregnancy in those with kidney disease had 52 per cent increased odds of preterm delivery and 33 per cent increased odds of caesarean delivery (Kendrick et. al., 2015). Infants whose mothers had kidney disease had 71 per cent increased odds of needing admission to neonatal intensive care units or death, and kidney disease in mothers created a 2-fold increased odds of low birth weight (Rajapakse et al 2019). Maternal kidney disease substantially increases the incidence of “death, foetal prematurity, and low birth rate” (Fischer 2007, p. 135). The Australian Institute of Health and Wellbeing also state that 57 per cent of Indigenous infant deaths that occurred between 2015 and 2019 were due to prenatal conditions (Australian Government Institute of Health and Welfare, 2023).

By using Bacchi’s (2009) framework, I found a situation of symptoms only being addressed in the policy and no evidence that the government was linking the connection I could see between the lack of safe, clean water and the high rates of CKD occurring in Western Australia, where it is endemic (Rajapakse et al., 2019), and in the Northern Territory. The lack of clean, safe water in the remote communities of the two jurisdictions is not news to federal or state governments as there has been an ongoing health crisis due to unsafe water that multiple reports have brought to their attention over the years. Yet it is only now that the State and Federal Governments are beginning to address the water issues.

Employing Bacchi’s question six about how the problem representation could be questioned, disrupted, and replaced, I made two recommendations. The first was to invest $1 million of the $150 million currently allocated in Outcome 9b of the CTG policy, to the National Water Grid Fund to install reverse osmosis filtration systems at the 20 sites Purple House services. If enacted, this would ensure safe and reliable water for those remote First Nations communities. The second recommendation was to immediately commence water quality testing in the 500 communities the WSAA has identified as having undrinkable water. If enacted, this would provide both the State and Federal Governments with a priority list of communities where water treatment processing plants need to be constructed.

Grace’s Story – Domestic and Family Violence Prevention

The social policy I analysed was the Queensland Domestic and Family Violence Prevention Strategy 2016-2026. This prevention strategy provides a framework for government to act against domestic and family violence and has four subsequent action plans, with the most recent action plan addressing coercive control (Queensland Government, 2016). The reason I chose to analyse this policy is because the Queensland Government plans to legislate coercive control by the end of this year, therefore highlighting the need for a current structural analysis of the problem. The Strategy has a vision of creating a Queensland free from domestic and family violence. Specifically, an objective is to legislate and criminalise coercive control by the end of 2023 with the overall aim of eliminating domestic and family violence.

My research found that compared to men, women are three times more likely to experience domestic and family violence, with one woman being murdered every week by a partner (Our Watch, 2023). Moreover, First Nations women are disproportionately more likely to experience domestic and family violence and are eleven times more likely to be killed due to family violence compared to non-Indigenous women (Commonwealth of Australia, 2022).  

A key characteristic of intimate partner homicide is a relationship in which coercive control is used to isolate and control the woman by a range of mechanisms, most of which are invisible to the public (Boxall et al., 2022). Drawing on Bacchi’s question three, I understand that historically, Australia has had a culture deeply engrained with normalising violence against women and maintaining silence about what happens in the private realm (of the home) (Piper, 2019). This culture has normalised domestic and family violence, so much so one can buy a singlet called the ‘wife beater’. Radical feminist discourse suggests the root cause of women’s oppression is in patriarchal gender relations (Pilcher & Whelehan, 2017; Damant et al., 2008), and this informs my belief that in the private realm a woman’s life is where the relationship itself is used as a mechanism of subordination. Furthermore, I now recognise Australia as a patriarchal society that supports this dominant ideology which is used to sustain the isolation of women to the private realm by limiting their ability to participate in the community. This has created a cultural norm in which women stay home and raise children while male partners go out and work (Baxter, 2018). In some households, this can turn a relationship into one of dependency and subservience creating ideal conditions for coercive control to take place (Stark, 2012).

However, I identified that this gendered structural analysis of domestic and family violence does not consider the detrimental socio-economic and cultural impacts of colonisation on First Nations women, impacts that contribute to their experiences of domestic and family violence. These include intergenerational trauma, economic exclusion and dispossession of land and family (Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety [ANROWS], 2023). Evidence suggests that 70% to 90% of First Nations women in prison have experienced domestic and family violence either as a child or an adult (Commonwealth of Australia, 2022). First Nations women are overly represented in the criminal justice system and are often misidentified as the person who uses violence (Commonwealth of Australia, 2022). Furthermore, retaliation for their own protection or the protection of their children or misidentification due to racial stereotypes often leads to co-responding protection orders being placed against the victim-survivor (Commonwealth of Australia, 2022). Therefore, the intersection between gender inequality and racial inequality highlights that domestic and family violence can be much more than a cultural issue (ANROWS, 2016). 

Drawing on Bacchi’s question four about what is left problematic with government’s framing of a policy issue, I identified that consultation with First Nations women on this issue and the legislation of coercive control is imperative for Government to understand how this could create further harm to First Nations communities if not properly implemented. The discourse used within the prevention strategy suggests that the behaviours around coercive control need to change. Although this creates an assumption that the community has a comprehensive understanding of coercive control and are therefore capable to commit to change. Additionally, the 2021 National Community Attitudes Towards Violence Against Women Survey shows that 41% of respondents believed that domestic and family violence is committed equally by men and women (ANROWS, 2021). This suggests that the community is still unaware of unequal gender relations and how this influences domestic and family violence.

Additionally, there is an assumption that the criminalisation of coercive control will address the help seeking behaviours of women experiencing domestic and family violence, although the evidence suggests that rates of help seeking are higher for women who experience coercive control as well as physical and/or sexual abuse, rather than just coercive control (Boxall & Morgan, 2021). Furthermore, it is evident that the current systems we have in place are inadequate to support victim-survivors, with service organisations and law enforcement already overrun and struggling to keep up with rates of domestic and family violence (Burt & Iorio, 2023). Our systems that support victim-survivors of domestic and family violence have been structured as crisis responses that offer immediate safety planning, accommodation, and case management. This support is happening after the violence has already occurred with most services meeting woman who are at ‘rock bottom’ and already in grave danger.

After I researched similar social policy in other countries, I discovered that although England and Wales criminalised coercive control in 2015 the understanding of what constitutes coercive control and the ability to recognise it is still unclear. This impacts the practices and responses of service delivery. Additionally, missed or under reporting of coercive control has led to inadequate assessments of risk, resulting in victims being overlooked and murdered (Robinson, Myhill & Wire, 2018). I believe, therefore, a robust approach to re-structuring and re-defining domestic and family violence is needed.

During my policy advocacy presentation and review submission, I made a recommendation to governments to establish a nationwide definition of coercive control enabling a shared understanding and an unambiguous approach to responding to coercive control. Defining coercive control will encompass all forms of nonphysical violence, and will provide law enforcement, the community, and legal systems with a clear definition to respond effectively and lessen the deleterious impacts of this issue facing First Nations women.  

Conclusion

Bacchi’s critical questioning framework for policy analysis draws on social construction theory, about what we take to be ‘fixed’ reality is actually contextual, historical and changing. It also draws on feminist body theory and acts as a counterbalance to focus on people’s perceptions, ensuring that lived experience receives due recognition. Grace and Cheryl’s stories of social policy analysis provide an excellent example of how practitioners could use the framework and work with communities to develop their own structural analysis about the root causes of ongoing disadvantage. The issues raised by them paint a damning picture of a vulnerable population group whose voices are not yet being given space at the policy-making table. 

References

ABC News 2022a, NT Laramba residents consider further court action as absence of safe water laws problematic, viewed 28 May 2023, NT Laramba residents consider further court action as absence of safe water laws problematic – ABC News 

ABC News 2022b, Residents of remote Kiwirrkurra are worried about tap water, but a reverse osmosis water purifier could help, viewed 28 May 2023, Residents of remote Kiwirrkurra are worried about tap water, but a reverse osmosis water purifier could help – ABC News 

Alinsky, S 1971, Rules for Radicals, Random House, New York.

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2019, viewed 28 May 2023, National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey, 2018-19 financial year, Australian Bureau of Statistics (abs.gov.au) 

Australian Government 2020a, Closing the Gap Report, viewed 27 May 2023, Closing the Gap 2020, Closing the Gap (niaa.gov.au)  

Australian Government 2020b, Child Mortality, viewed 27 May 2023, Child Mortality, Closing the Gap (niaa.gov.au)

Australian Government 2020c, Life Expectancy, viewed 27 May 2023, Life Expectancy, Closing the Gap (niaa.gov.au)  

Australian Government 2022, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, viewed 28 May 2023, Australian_Drinking_Water_Guidelines_ADWG_V3-8_Sep2022.pdf

Australian Government 2023, Commonwealth Closing the Gap Implementation Plan, viewed 27 May 2023, 2023 Commonwealth Closing the Gap Implementation Plan, National Indigenous Agency (niaa.gov.au).  

Australian Government Institute of Health and Welfare 2023, Chronic Kidney Disease: Australian Facts, viewed 28 May 2023, Chronic kidney disease: Australian facts, Mortality-Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (aihw.gov.au).

Australian Government Ministers, Department of Health and Aged Care, viewed 31 May 2023, New renal dialysis units for remote First Nations patients, Health Portfolio Ministers and Aged Care. 

Australian Indigenous Health Info Net nd, viewed 27 May 2023, History of Closing the Gap – Closing the Gap – Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet (ecu.edu.au)

Baxter J, 2018, ‘Fathers and Work: A statistical overview’, Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety 2016, Existing knowledge, practice and responses to violence against women in Australian Indigenous communities: State of knowledge paper, Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, August 2, 2023, https://www.anrows.org.au/publication/existing-knowledge-practice-and-responses-to-violence-against-women-in-australian-indigenous-communities-state-of-knowledge-paper/.

Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety 2021, The 2021 National Community Attitudes towards Violence against Women Survey, Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, August 2, 2023, https://www.anrows.org.au/publication/attitudes-matter-the-2021-national-community-attitudes-towards-violence-against-women-survey-ncas-findings-for-australia/.

Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Fast Facts- Indigenous Family Violence, Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, August 2, 2023, https://www.anrows.org.au/resources/fast-facts-indigenous-family-violence/#:~:text=This%20resource%20provides%20a%20brief,to%20inform%20their%20decision%2Dmaking.

Bacchi, C 2009, Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to be? Pearson, Frenchs Forest.

Boxall, H, Doherty, L, Lawler, S, Franks, C & Bricknell, S 2022, The “Pathways to intimate partner homicide” project: Key stages and events in male-perpetrated intimate partner homicide in Australia, Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety, August 2, 2023, https://anrowsdev.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Boxall-et-al_Pathways-to-intimate-partner-homicide.2.2.pdf.

Boxall & Morgan 2021, Experiences of coercive control among Australian women, Australian Government, August 2, 2023, https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-03/sb30_experiences_of_coercive_control_among_australian_women_v2.pdf.

Burt, J & Iorio, K 2023, Domestic violence law reforms pass Queensland parliament, but consultation on criminalisation of coercive control continues, ABC News, August 2, 2023, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-23/coercive-control-queensland-parliament-domestic-violence-laws/102012376.

Commonwealth of Australia 2022, National Plan to End Violence against Women and Children 2022–2032, Department of Social Services, August 2, 2023, https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/11_2022/national_plan_to_end_violence_against_women_and_children_2022-2032.pdf.

Damant, D, Lapierre, S, Kouraga, A, Fortin, A, Hamelin-Brabant, L, Lavergne, C & Lessard, G 2008, “Taking child abuse and mothering into account,” Affilia, 23(2):123–133, https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109908314321.

Freire, P 1970, Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.

Freire, P 1974, Education for critical consciousness. Continuum.

Gajjala, Prathibha Reddy & Sanati, Maryam & Jankowski, Joachim 2015, Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Chronic Kidney Disease with Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Diseases as Its Comorbidities. Frontiers in immunology, Vol 6, p. 340. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00340 

Geoghegan, M & Powell, F 2009, ‘Community Development and the Contested Politics of the Late Modern Agora: Of, Alongside or Against Neoliberalism?’, Community Development Journal, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 430-447.

Hormones Australia Endocrine Society of Australia 2018, Kidney Disease and Diabetes – What is the Link? Dr Nicolette Hodyl, viewed 26 May 2023, Kidney disease and diabetes – what is the link?, Hormones Australia (hormones-australia.org.au).

Kendrick J, Sharma S, Holmen J, Palit S, Nuccio E & Chonchol M 2015, Kidney disease and maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy, American Journal of Kidney Disease, Vol 66, no.1, pp.55-9. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.019. 

Ledwith, M 2011, Community development: A critical approach (2nd ed.). Policy Press.

McArthur, J 2023, ‘Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well-being, and society’, Higher Education, Vol. 85, pp. 85-101.

Northern Territory Government and Information Services 2023, viewed 28 May 2023, Laramba Water Treatment Plant officially opened | NT.GOV.AU 

Our Watch 2021, Quick facts Preventing violence against women, August 2, 2023, https://www,ourwatch.org.au/quick-facts/.

Pan F, Owen N and Oddy W 2021, Sugar sweetened beverages and increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the Indigenous community of Australia, Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, Vol 31, no. 10, Pages 2825-2830, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.06.014

Our Watch 2021, Quick Facts Preventing Violence Against Women, August 2, 2023, https://www.ourwatch.org.au/quick-facts/.

Piper, A & Stevenson, A 2019, The long history of gender violence in Australia, and why it matters today, The Conversation, August 2, 2023, https://theconversation.com/the-long-history-of-gender-violence-in-australia-and-why-it-matters-today-119927.

Queensland Government 2016, Domestic and Family Violence Prevention Strategy 2016-2026, Queensland Government, August 2, 2023, https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/ckan-publications-attachments-prod/resources/008db60d-06e9-4702-bb87-48be367edf93/dfv-prevention-strategy.pdf?ETag=ef56a614ca32eedadca2acffc3f37578.

Robinson, AL, Myhill, A & Wire, J 2017, “Practitioner (mis)understandings of coercive control in England and Wales,” Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1):29–49, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817728381.

Stark, E 2012, “Looking beyond domestic violence: Policing coercive control,” Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 12(2):199–217, https://doi.org/10.1080/15332586.2012.725016.

The University of Queensland Australia 2022, viewed 3 August 2023, Countless reports show water is undrinkable in many Indigenous communities. Why has nothing changed? – Faculty of Medicine – University of Queensland (uq.edu.au) 

 Water Services Association of Australia 2022, viewed 28 May 2023,  Gaps to fill to ensure safe drinking water for First Nations communities | Water Services Association of Australia (wsaa.asn.au) 

Whelehan, I & Pilcher, J 2017, Key concepts in Gender Studies, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920224.

Australia’s Homeless Crisis: Detrimental Impacts on Older Women

Older single women in Australia are at high risk of facing a crisis. One brought on by neoliberal ideologies and policies which intersect with gender and wage bias, along with the historical marginalisation of women in a patriarchal society. This crisis is homelessness and why it is exponentially growing can be understood through the lens of feminist standpoint theory and neoliberalism.

Like all theories, feminist standpoint theory has its limitations and uses. It assists with analysing and understanding this particular social justice issue because feminist standpoint theory considers the individual experiences of the women involved. It also takes into consideration women’s historical roles in society. Standpoint theory emerged from Marxism wherein it was seen that members of society who were oppressed were privy to knowledge the privileged class were not aware of (Borland 2020). In 1983 when Nancy Hartsock published her book “Money, Sex and Power” she provided a theoretical method which took into consideration women’s unique perspectives within society (Hekman 1997, p. 341). This theory also justified feminist claims regarding women being oppressed members of society and feminist standpoint theory as a methodology began (Hekman 1997). During the 80s and 90s other contributors to this theory included Sandra Harding, Merrill Hintikka, Patricia Hill Collins and Dorothy Smith (Hekman 1997; Borland 2020). Harding was of the view that even though scientific researchers claimed to be neutral, their research methods and results were sexist (Borland 2020, p.1).

Harding saw that by implementing standpoint theory, it would reveal the power held within ‘scientific authority’ and would create ‘knowledge that is embodied, self-critical and coherent’ (Borland 2020, p.1). Patricia Hill Collins contributed an African American feminist perspective arguing that race, gender, class oppression and lack of privilege for African American women also provided a unique perspective to the feminist landscape which needed to be seen (Borland 2020). Whilst standpoint theory can be seen as essentialist due to the implied belief that a universal female standpoint exists, theorists utilising feminist standpoint theory have chosen to focus on the ‘political aspects of social position’ from a feminist view rather than speaking for all women (Borland 2020, p.1). Use of feminist standpoint theory and practice, however, has come under scrutiny as it appears to challenge the more recent feminist theories which have emerged from ‘postmodernism and poststructuralism’ (Hekman 1997, p.342).

Nonetheless, Hekman (1997, p.342) argues that feminist standpoint theory is based on the understanding that “knowledge is situated and perspectival, and that there are multiple standpoints from which knowledge is produced.” Hawkesworth (1999) sees feminist standpoint theory not as an epistemology but as an analytical tool. Both Hawkesworth (1999) and Hekman (1997) posit there are various types of competing feminist standpoints and that by critically examining those, problems can be illuminated which Hawkesworth (1997, p.152) states …’empirical research must engage’.

When looking at the issue of older single homeless women in Australia some of the specific gender-based factors for this cohort are that their earlier lives have been shaped by the societal norm they would marry and their husband would provide for them in their roles as homemakers, child-bearers and predominantly mothers (Darab & Hartman 2013; Hartman & Darab 2017). According to McFerren & Laverty (2010),a high percentage of older single homeless women have suffered domestic violence or experienced adverse tragedy in their earlier lives. Common themes found in various studies concerning lack of housing security available to these women both now and into the foreseeable future, are cited as being systemic issues; domestic violence; age, wage, employment and gender discrimination; and relationship breakups (McFerren & Laverty 2010;Darab & Hartman 2013; Hartman & Darab 2017; Irwin & Leeson 2016; Sharman 2017; Faulkner & Lestner 2020). Invisibility via research and media representation of this group of women, which results in a lack of service provision specifically tailored for them, along with housing unaffordability, are also cited as being factors which are contributing to the increasing number of older women who are, or are becoming, homeless (McFerren & Laverty 2010; Darab & Hartman 2013; Hartman & Darab 2017; Irwin & Leeson 2016; Sharman 2017; Faulkner & Lestner 2020).

In 2017 Hartman & Darab conducted a qualitative research project using feminist standpoint theory regarding older homeless women and pathways to housing in the rural area of the Northern Rivers, New South Wales. They found intersectionality was occurring between gender, relationship status, aging and lack of home ownership (Hartman & Darab 2017). The absence of employment opportunities combined with minimal public transport were also cited as factors contributing to older single women becoming homeless in the region (Hartman & Darab 2017). Reasons Sharman (2017) gives for the rise in numbers of older single homeless women in her Victorian study are that these women, due to the roles they played earlier in their lives were locked out of the labour market and as such were prevented from accumulating superannuation and savings. Sharman (2017, p.51) also cites ‘adverse critical life experiences’ which are ‘non-normative’, as being a factor. For example, the unexpected death of a partner, ill health, sick children, unemployment or disability all can impact on an individual’s ability to function as they would normally expect to (Sharman 2017).

Other critical life events which Sharman (2017) states have impacted on older single women have been rental increases, mortgagee repossessions, evictions and housing stress brought on by increasing costs where 30 per cent or more of household income is required to secure housing. In addition to the aforementioned factors women’s work is often undervalued, unpaid or underpaid (Sharman 2017; Healy & Kidd 2013). Many women’s working lives are interrupted by children and they are often pushed into the dominant female industries of health, teaching and retail (Sharman 2017). Mostly relying on less pay than male counterparts along with part-time or casual work to meet family responsibilities results in less savings and less superannuation being accumulated by the time they retire (Sharman 2017; Healy & Kidd 2013). Recent research by Faulkner and Lestner (2020) estimated “240,000 women aged 55 or older and another 165,000 women aged 45-54 are at risk of homelessness” in Australia.

Whilst no government is responsible for exceptional individual life experiences, under the United Nations agreements Australia is privy to, the State is responsible for the provision of certain basic human rights to all citizens, which it does not appear to be adhering to. In 1976 Australia ratified the United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. At Article 11, 1., it states that adequate housing is a fundamental human right (Marston, McDonald & Bryson 2014; Australian Legal Information Institute 1976; Australian Human Rights Commission 1976; Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission 1996). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which Australia was a founding contributor to in 1948 and signatory of, at Article 25, states, “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and his family, including … housing” (United Nations 1948).Despite these signed agreements, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics 2016 Census, there were an estimated “6,866” homeless older women and “5,820” older women who were “living in marginal housing” and “may be at risk of homelessness” (Australian Bureau of Statistics 2017; Australian Human Rights Commission 2019a).

Further, older women are seen to be “the fastest-growing cohort of homeless Australians” evidenced by a 31 per cent increase occurring between 2011 and 2016. (Australian Human Rights Commission 2019a; Australian Human Rights Commission 2019b). Dominant neo-liberal ideology and practices which have been occurring in Westernised countries for the past 30 years are a major factor which impacts on homelessness (Bullen 2015; Hartman & Darab 2017). Neo-liberalism is a mode of governing which emphasises free markets, individuals being solely responsible for themselves and market like modes of service provision (Bullen 2015; Hartman & Darab 2017).

As a consequence of neoliberalism, there has been a shift away from discourses of homelessness being a social issue brought about by unemployment, poverty, domestic violence and disadvantage, to being one of a personal issue (Bullen 2015; Sharman 2017). This has consequently had a detrimental impact on service provision and created negative feelings of self-worth, blame and exclusion for homeless persons (Bullen 2015).  Policies implemented, which included the reduction of capital gains tax in 1999 and negative gearing in the late 1980s, have resulted in decreased housing affordability as house prices, compared to available income during the past 15 years, has increased sharply (Hartman & Darab 2017). Further, there has been a decline in public housing availability since the 1990s as the State’s focus has been on offering financial support for low-income earners via rent assistance within the private rental market, as well as implementing the first home owner’s grant, rather than providing public housing (Hartman & Darab 2017).

These policies have resulted in a rental market which favours investors and landlords (Hartman & Darab 2017). Media representation based on neo-liberal principles presents a perspective of homelessness, generally speaking, that some are deserving and undeserving of State assistance (Lyons & Smedley 2020). Those who are considered deserving are those who through no personal fault suddenly find themselves homeless and those who are classed as undeserving are often stereotyped as being slack due to the perception that they are incompetent (Lyons & Smedley 2020). What is missing from media representation regarding homelessness in Australia is a discussion concerning the growing number of single older women who are unable to secure a home (Lyons & Smedley 2020).

Whilst there is not a lot of research available regarding this sector of homelessness specifically, research does validate that a looming crisis is pending. Many factors are contributing to single older women becoming homeless in Australia, not the least of which are neoliberal ideology and practices that are proving to not only be detrimental to a whole generation of women currently but potentially also for women in the future.

Copyright C. O’Connor, November 2021.

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics 2017, 2016 Census, viewed 23 August 2020 https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/2016 

Australian Human Rights Commission 2019a, Older Women’s Risk of Homelessness: Background Paper, viewed 20 August 2020,  https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/ahrc_ow_homelessness2019.pdf

Australian Human Rights Commission 2019b, Risks of Homelessness in older women, viewed 20 August 2020, https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/age-discrimination/projects/risk-homelessness-older-women  

Australian Human Rights Commission 1976, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, viewed 20 August 2020, https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/commission-general/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-human-rights 

Australian Legal Information Institute, Australian Treaty Series 1976, No 5, Department of Foreign Affairs, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, United Nations, New York, viewed http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1976/5.html  

Borland E 2020, Standpoint theory, viewed 20 August 2020, https://www.britannica.com/topic/standpoint-theory

Bullen J 2015, ‘Governing Homelessness: The Discursive and Institutional

Construction of Homelessness in Australia’, Housing, Theory and Society, 32:2, 218-239, doi:10.1080/14036096.2015.1024886

Darab, S & Hartman Y 2013, ‘Understanding Single Older Women’s Invisibility in Housing Issues in Australia’, Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–20, doi:10.1080/14036096.2012.746944

Faulkner D & Lester L 2020, ‘400,000 women over 45 are at risk of homelessness in Australia The Conversation, viewed 23 August 2020https://theconversation.com/400-000-women-over-45-are-at-risk-of-homelessness-in-australia-142906

Hartman, Y & Darab, S 2017, ‘The housing pathways of single older non-home owning women in a rural region of Australia’, Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 54, pp. 234–243, doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.003.

Hawkesworth, M 1999, ‘Analyzing backlash: Feminist standpoint theory as analytical tool’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 135–155, doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00003-5.

Healy, J & Kidd, M 2013, ‘Gender-based undervaluation and the equal remuneration powers of Fair Work Australia’, Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 760–782, doi: 10.1177/0022185613491683.

Hekman, S 1997, ‘Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited’, Signs, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 341–365, doi:10.1086/495159.

Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission 1996, Housing as a human right, viewed 20 August 2020 https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/content/pdf/human_rights/housing.pdf

Irwin P & Leeson G 2016, ‘Late Middle-Aged Single Women and The Risk of Homelessness in Rural Australia’, The Gerontologist, vol. 56, no. Suppl3, pp. 719–719, doi:10.1093/geront/gnw162.2932.

Lyons G & Smedley C (2020) ‘The new face of homelessness? Examining media representations of women’s homelessness in five Australian news sources’, Journal of Social Distress and Homelessness, doi:10.1080/10530789.2019.1709269

McFerran, L & Laverty, S 2010, ‘It could be you: female, single, older and homeless’, Parity, vol. 23, no. 7, ISSN:1032-6170

Marston, G, McDonald, C & Bryson, L 2014, The Australian welfare state: who benefits now?, Palgrave Macmillan, South Yarra. 

Petersen, M 2015, ‘Addressing older women’s homelessness: service and housing models’ Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 419–438,458, doi:10.1002/j.1839-4655.2015.tb00358.x.

Sharman A 2017, The Voices of Midlife Women Facing Housing Insecurity in Victoria, Australia, Social Policy & Society, Vol 16, No. 1, pp.49-63, doi:10.1017/S1474746415000603

United Nations 1948, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, viewed 23 August 2020, https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html